Review





Similar Products

96
Miltenyi Biotec anti human cd19 antibody conjugated with apc
Anti Human Cd19 Antibody Conjugated With Apc, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/apc+conjugated+anti+cd19/CD19+Antibody%2C+anti-human/us12442016-918-18-27
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti human cd19 antibody conjugated with apc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Agilent technologies apc-conjugated anti-human cd19
Lysis induced by RTX-SCR1920 is restricted to <t>CD19-positive</t> cells and does not affect <t>CD19-negative</t> cell populations significantly. PBMCs from four CLL patients were treated with RTX-SCR-constructs in concentrations of 100, 50 or 10 µg/mL in a CDC assay. CD19+ (A) and CD19- (B) cells were stained and analyzed by flow-cytometry. Survival rates (PI-negative cells) were calculated relative to hiNHS sample. n=4; mean+/-SD (C) The treatment of PBMCs with RTX-SCR1920 led to a massive increase in PI-positive, dead CD19-expressing cells. This effect did not appear with the RTX-SCR1112 antibody. In contrast, a decrease of PI-negative living cells was not visible in CD19-negative populations. The results of one representative measurement are shown.
Apc Conjugated Anti Human Cd19, supplied by Agilent technologies, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/apc+conjugated+anti+cd19/pmc11298693-54-15-23
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
apc-conjugated anti-human cd19 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Miltenyi Biotec apc conjugated anti cd19
Lysis induced by RTX-SCR1920 is restricted to <t>CD19-positive</t> cells and does not affect <t>CD19-negative</t> cell populations significantly. PBMCs from four CLL patients were treated with RTX-SCR-constructs in concentrations of 100, 50 or 10 µg/mL in a CDC assay. CD19+ (A) and CD19- (B) cells were stained and analyzed by flow-cytometry. Survival rates (PI-negative cells) were calculated relative to hiNHS sample. n=4; mean+/-SD (C) The treatment of PBMCs with RTX-SCR1920 led to a massive increase in PI-positive, dead CD19-expressing cells. This effect did not appear with the RTX-SCR1112 antibody. In contrast, a decrease of PI-negative living cells was not visible in CD19-negative populations. The results of one representative measurement are shown.
Apc Conjugated Anti Cd19, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/apc+conjugated+anti+cd19/CD19-APC/pmc12311797-107-32-35
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
apc conjugated anti cd19 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson allophycocyanin (apc)-conjugated anti-cd19
Lysis induced by RTX-SCR1920 is restricted to <t>CD19-positive</t> cells and does not affect <t>CD19-negative</t> cell populations significantly. PBMCs from four CLL patients were treated with RTX-SCR-constructs in concentrations of 100, 50 or 10 µg/mL in a CDC assay. CD19+ (A) and CD19- (B) cells were stained and analyzed by flow-cytometry. Survival rates (PI-negative cells) were calculated relative to hiNHS sample. n=4; mean+/-SD (C) The treatment of PBMCs with RTX-SCR1920 led to a massive increase in PI-positive, dead CD19-expressing cells. This effect did not appear with the RTX-SCR1112 antibody. In contrast, a decrease of PI-negative living cells was not visible in CD19-negative populations. The results of one representative measurement are shown.
Allophycocyanin (Apc) Conjugated Anti Cd19, supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/apc+conjugated+anti+cd19/anti+cd19/pmc11980771-70-10-13
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
allophycocyanin (apc)-conjugated anti-cd19 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Elabscience Biotechnology anti mouse cd19 antibody conjugated to apc
Lysis induced by RTX-SCR1920 is restricted to <t>CD19-positive</t> cells and does not affect <t>CD19-negative</t> cell populations significantly. PBMCs from four CLL patients were treated with RTX-SCR-constructs in concentrations of 100, 50 or 10 µg/mL in a CDC assay. CD19+ (A) and CD19- (B) cells were stained and analyzed by flow-cytometry. Survival rates (PI-negative cells) were calculated relative to hiNHS sample. n=4; mean+/-SD (C) The treatment of PBMCs with RTX-SCR1920 led to a massive increase in PI-positive, dead CD19-expressing cells. This effect did not appear with the RTX-SCR1112 antibody. In contrast, a decrease of PI-negative living cells was not visible in CD19-negative populations. The results of one representative measurement are shown.
Anti Mouse Cd19 Antibody Conjugated To Apc, supplied by Elabscience Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/apc+conjugated+anti+cd19/APC+Anti-Mouse+CD19+Antibody/pm40138757-57-4-10
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti mouse cd19 antibody conjugated to apc - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thermo Fisher apc-conjugated cd19 anti-human

Apc Conjugated Cd19 Anti Human, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/apc+conjugated+anti+cd19/bio_rxiv__2025__01__26__634939-189-104-116
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
apc-conjugated cd19 anti-human - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Cytek Biosciences anti cd19 apc conjugate
Antibodies used.
Anti Cd19 Apc Conjugate, supplied by Cytek Biosciences, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/apc+conjugated+anti+cd19/APC+Anti-Mouse+CD19/pmc11539501-1-0-4
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd19 apc conjugate - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Exbio Praha anti-human cd19-apc-cytm7 conjugated
Antibodies used.
Anti Human Cd19 Apc Cytm7 Conjugated, supplied by Exbio Praha, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/apc+conjugated+anti+cd19/pe+conjugated+anti+cd19/pm39307436-57-17-20
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti-human cd19-apc-cytm7 conjugated - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thermo Fisher apc alexa fluor 750-conjugated anti-cd19
Comparative analysis of NK cell profile in CMV-infected vs. uninfected pregnant women. Representative gating strategy for CMV-induced memory-like NK cell subsets is shown in panel ( A ). Scatter plots with bar (mean ± SD) depict frequency distribution with respect to ( B ) live lymphocytes of NK (CD56+CD16+/−), CD56bright (CD56brightCD16−), CD56dim (CD56dimCD16+), and CD56low (CD56lowCD16+) cells gated on <t>CD3-CD19-CD14−</t> cells. ( C ) CD56dim cells of subpopulations distinguished on the basis of surface expression levels of CD57, DNAM-1, KIR, NKG2A, NKG2C, NKG2D, and PD-1 markers, either alone or in combination. Mann–Whitney test was used to assess differences in cell frequencies between CMV-infected (orange dots, n = 17) and uninfected (green dots, n = 5) pregnant women. Significance was set at p < 0.05.
Apc Alexa Fluor 750 Conjugated Anti Cd19, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/apc+conjugated+anti+cd19/pmc11125694-100-47-53
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
apc alexa fluor 750-conjugated anti-cd19 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Becton Dickinson apc-conjugated anti-cd19 (1d3)
Comparative analysis of NK cell profile in CMV-infected vs. uninfected pregnant women. Representative gating strategy for CMV-induced memory-like NK cell subsets is shown in panel ( A ). Scatter plots with bar (mean ± SD) depict frequency distribution with respect to ( B ) live lymphocytes of NK (CD56+CD16+/−), CD56bright (CD56brightCD16−), CD56dim (CD56dimCD16+), and CD56low (CD56lowCD16+) cells gated on <t>CD3-CD19-CD14−</t> cells. ( C ) CD56dim cells of subpopulations distinguished on the basis of surface expression levels of CD57, DNAM-1, KIR, NKG2A, NKG2C, NKG2D, and PD-1 markers, either alone or in combination. Mann–Whitney test was used to assess differences in cell frequencies between CMV-infected (orange dots, n = 17) and uninfected (green dots, n = 5) pregnant women. Significance was set at p < 0.05.
Apc Conjugated Anti Cd19 (1d3), supplied by Becton Dickinson, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/apc+conjugated+anti+cd19/anti+cd19/pm38709375-78-50-57
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
apc-conjugated anti-cd19 (1d3) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Lysis induced by RTX-SCR1920 is restricted to CD19-positive cells and does not affect CD19-negative cell populations significantly. PBMCs from four CLL patients were treated with RTX-SCR-constructs in concentrations of 100, 50 or 10 µg/mL in a CDC assay. CD19+ (A) and CD19- (B) cells were stained and analyzed by flow-cytometry. Survival rates (PI-negative cells) were calculated relative to hiNHS sample. n=4; mean+/-SD (C) The treatment of PBMCs with RTX-SCR1920 led to a massive increase in PI-positive, dead CD19-expressing cells. This effect did not appear with the RTX-SCR1112 antibody. In contrast, a decrease of PI-negative living cells was not visible in CD19-negative populations. The results of one representative measurement are shown.

Journal: Frontiers in Immunology

Article Title: Enhancement of complement-dependent cytotoxicity by linking factor-H derived short consensus repeats 19-20 to CD20 antibodies

doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1379023

Figure Lengend Snippet: Lysis induced by RTX-SCR1920 is restricted to CD19-positive cells and does not affect CD19-negative cell populations significantly. PBMCs from four CLL patients were treated with RTX-SCR-constructs in concentrations of 100, 50 or 10 µg/mL in a CDC assay. CD19+ (A) and CD19- (B) cells were stained and analyzed by flow-cytometry. Survival rates (PI-negative cells) were calculated relative to hiNHS sample. n=4; mean+/-SD (C) The treatment of PBMCs with RTX-SCR1920 led to a massive increase in PI-positive, dead CD19-expressing cells. This effect did not appear with the RTX-SCR1112 antibody. In contrast, a decrease of PI-negative living cells was not visible in CD19-negative populations. The results of one representative measurement are shown.

Article Snippet: The complement deposition on B cells and non-B cells was determined by staining with APC-conjugated anti-human CD19 and polyclonal rabbit anti-human C3c complement/FITC (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

Techniques: Lysis, Construct, CDC Assay, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Expressing

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: The biochemical function of bivalent aptamer assemblies against B-cell markers CD19 and CD20

doi: 10.1101/2025.01.26.634939

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: PE-conjugated CD19 anti-human monoclonal antibody (mouse, isotype IgG1, Clone 4G7, Catalog no. PE-65|97, Proteintech), PE-conjugated CD19 mouse anti-human (isotype IgG1, κ, Clone SJ25C1, Catalog no. 12-0198-42, Invitrogen), PE-conjugated CD20 anti-human (mouse, isotype IgG2b, κ, Clone 2H7, Catalog no. 302305, BioLegend), PE Mouse IgG1, κ, isotype control (CloneMOPC-21, Catalog no. 556650, BD Pharmingen), FITC-conjugated CD20 anti-human monoclonal antibody (mouse, isotype IgG2b, Clone 2H7, Catalog no. 35-0209-T100), FITC-conjugated CD19 mouse anti-human (isotype IgG1, κ, Clone SJ25C1, Catalog no. 363008, BioLegend), Monoclonal Rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (Clone 60024B; Catalog no. IC1051G, R&D Systems, MN), APC Mouse IgG1, κ, Isotype Ctrl (FC) (Clone MOPC-21; Catalog no. 400122), APC-conjugated CD19 anti-human (mouse, isotype IgG1, κ, Clone SJ25C1, Catalog no. 17-0198-42, Invitrogen), APC-conjugated mouse anti-human CD20 (isotype IgG2b, κ, Clone 2H7, Catalog no. 559776, BD Pharmingen), and APC-conjugated CD21 mouse anti-human (isotype IgG2a κ, Clone HB5, Catalog no. 17-0219-42, Invitrogen) were used for routine flow cytometry analysis.

Techniques: Binding Assay, Construct

(A) Representative flow cytometric histograms showing the specificity of dimeric CD20 aptamer WB1/1.CD20.1_3S across CD20-positive cell lines (Raji, Toledo, BJAB, SKLY-16, and Ramos). (B) Bar graph quantifying the mean fluorescence intensities of WB1/1.CD20.1_3S binding, highlighting significant specificity (*p < 0.0001). (C; E) Fluorescence histograms for CD19 homodimeric aptamer WB17/17.CD19.1_3S and WB15/15.CD19.1_3S, respectively, demonstrating selective binding to CD19-positive cell lines (Raji, Toledo, BJAB, SKLY-16, and Ramos). (D; F) Quantification of homodimeric aptamer WB17/17.CD19.1_3S and WB15/15.CD19.1_3S, respectively, binding specificity using mean fluorescence intensity. (G) Fluorescence histograms for CD19 heterodimeric aptamer WB15/17.CD19.1_3S, demonstrating selective binding to CD19-positive cell lines (Raji, Toledo, BJAB, SKLY-16, and Ramos). (H) Quantification of heterodimeric aptamer WB15/17.CD19.1_3S binding specificity using mean fluorescence intensity. (I-L) Confocal microscopy images showing colocalization of bivalent WB1/1.CD20.1_3S (L1-L2: Cy3, RED) with a CD20-specific antibody (J1-J2: APC, GREEN) on Raji cells. DNA random aptamer controls and isotype antibody controls confirmed specificity. The aptamer binds to the cell surface membrane, as shown in zoomed-in views (L1-L2). Panel M-P: Confocal microscopy images of bivalent WB17/17.CD19.1_3S (M1-M2: Cy3, RED) colocalizing with a CD19-specific antibody (N1-N2: APC, GREEN) on Raji cells. The aptamer demonstrates specificity and surface binding with no significant off-target interactions. Zoomed-in views (P1-P2) confirmed aptamer binding to the cell membrane. Scale bars = 7 and 5 μm. Mean fluorescence intensity was calculated using the formula: Mean fluorescence intensity=Aptamer Mean Fluorescence − Random DNA Mean Fluorescence. The aptamer and random mean fluorescence values correspond to the mean fluorescence observed in their respective histograms. Bar graphs represent mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments with statistical significance indicated (****p < 0.0001). Data represents mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: The biochemical function of bivalent aptamer assemblies against B-cell markers CD19 and CD20

doi: 10.1101/2025.01.26.634939

Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Representative flow cytometric histograms showing the specificity of dimeric CD20 aptamer WB1/1.CD20.1_3S across CD20-positive cell lines (Raji, Toledo, BJAB, SKLY-16, and Ramos). (B) Bar graph quantifying the mean fluorescence intensities of WB1/1.CD20.1_3S binding, highlighting significant specificity (*p < 0.0001). (C; E) Fluorescence histograms for CD19 homodimeric aptamer WB17/17.CD19.1_3S and WB15/15.CD19.1_3S, respectively, demonstrating selective binding to CD19-positive cell lines (Raji, Toledo, BJAB, SKLY-16, and Ramos). (D; F) Quantification of homodimeric aptamer WB17/17.CD19.1_3S and WB15/15.CD19.1_3S, respectively, binding specificity using mean fluorescence intensity. (G) Fluorescence histograms for CD19 heterodimeric aptamer WB15/17.CD19.1_3S, demonstrating selective binding to CD19-positive cell lines (Raji, Toledo, BJAB, SKLY-16, and Ramos). (H) Quantification of heterodimeric aptamer WB15/17.CD19.1_3S binding specificity using mean fluorescence intensity. (I-L) Confocal microscopy images showing colocalization of bivalent WB1/1.CD20.1_3S (L1-L2: Cy3, RED) with a CD20-specific antibody (J1-J2: APC, GREEN) on Raji cells. DNA random aptamer controls and isotype antibody controls confirmed specificity. The aptamer binds to the cell surface membrane, as shown in zoomed-in views (L1-L2). Panel M-P: Confocal microscopy images of bivalent WB17/17.CD19.1_3S (M1-M2: Cy3, RED) colocalizing with a CD19-specific antibody (N1-N2: APC, GREEN) on Raji cells. The aptamer demonstrates specificity and surface binding with no significant off-target interactions. Zoomed-in views (P1-P2) confirmed aptamer binding to the cell membrane. Scale bars = 7 and 5 μm. Mean fluorescence intensity was calculated using the formula: Mean fluorescence intensity=Aptamer Mean Fluorescence − Random DNA Mean Fluorescence. The aptamer and random mean fluorescence values correspond to the mean fluorescence observed in their respective histograms. Bar graphs represent mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments with statistical significance indicated (****p < 0.0001). Data represents mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments.

Article Snippet: PE-conjugated CD19 anti-human monoclonal antibody (mouse, isotype IgG1, Clone 4G7, Catalog no. PE-65|97, Proteintech), PE-conjugated CD19 mouse anti-human (isotype IgG1, κ, Clone SJ25C1, Catalog no. 12-0198-42, Invitrogen), PE-conjugated CD20 anti-human (mouse, isotype IgG2b, κ, Clone 2H7, Catalog no. 302305, BioLegend), PE Mouse IgG1, κ, isotype control (CloneMOPC-21, Catalog no. 556650, BD Pharmingen), FITC-conjugated CD20 anti-human monoclonal antibody (mouse, isotype IgG2b, Clone 2H7, Catalog no. 35-0209-T100), FITC-conjugated CD19 mouse anti-human (isotype IgG1, κ, Clone SJ25C1, Catalog no. 363008, BioLegend), Monoclonal Rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (Clone 60024B; Catalog no. IC1051G, R&D Systems, MN), APC Mouse IgG1, κ, Isotype Ctrl (FC) (Clone MOPC-21; Catalog no. 400122), APC-conjugated CD19 anti-human (mouse, isotype IgG1, κ, Clone SJ25C1, Catalog no. 17-0198-42, Invitrogen), APC-conjugated mouse anti-human CD20 (isotype IgG2b, κ, Clone 2H7, Catalog no. 559776, BD Pharmingen), and APC-conjugated CD21 mouse anti-human (isotype IgG2a κ, Clone HB5, Catalog no. 17-0219-42, Invitrogen) were used for routine flow cytometry analysis.

Techniques: Fluorescence, Binding Assay, Confocal Microscopy, Membrane, Standard Deviation

Internalization studies of CD19 Antibody and Bivalent CD19 Aptamers in Ramos and Raji Cells. (A–H) Time-course analysis of CD19 antibody and bivalent CD19 aptamer internalization in Ramos cells (A, C, E, and G: CD21-negative) and Raji cells (B, D, F, and H: CD21-positive). (A-B) demonstrate internalization of APC-CD19 antibody in Ramos (A) and Raji (B) cells. In Ramos cells (A), CD19 antibody shows efficient internalization over 48 hours, while in Raji cells (B), CD21 expression inhibits internalization. (C-D) show internalization of bivalent CD19 aptamer WB17/17.CD19.1_3S in Ramos (C) and Raji (D) cells. WB17/17.CD19.1_3S shows robust internalization in Ramos cells (C), but reduced uptake in Raji cells owing to CD21-mediated blocking. (E-F) illustrate internalization of bivalent CD19 aptamer WB15/17.CD19.1_3S in Ramos (E) and Raji (F) cells. The aptamer demonstrates high internalization efficiency in Ramos cells (E), but not CD21-positive Raji cells (F). Panels G and H: Internalization of bivalent CD19 aptamer WB15/15.CD19.1_3S in Ramos (G) and Raji (H) cells. Similar to other bivalent aptamers, WB15/15.CD19.1_3S internalizes efficiently in CD21-negative Ramos cells (G), but CD21 expression in Raji cells (H) significantly blocks its internalization. Data are expressed as the percentage of internalization calculated as . Each bar represents mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: The biochemical function of bivalent aptamer assemblies against B-cell markers CD19 and CD20

doi: 10.1101/2025.01.26.634939

Figure Lengend Snippet: Internalization studies of CD19 Antibody and Bivalent CD19 Aptamers in Ramos and Raji Cells. (A–H) Time-course analysis of CD19 antibody and bivalent CD19 aptamer internalization in Ramos cells (A, C, E, and G: CD21-negative) and Raji cells (B, D, F, and H: CD21-positive). (A-B) demonstrate internalization of APC-CD19 antibody in Ramos (A) and Raji (B) cells. In Ramos cells (A), CD19 antibody shows efficient internalization over 48 hours, while in Raji cells (B), CD21 expression inhibits internalization. (C-D) show internalization of bivalent CD19 aptamer WB17/17.CD19.1_3S in Ramos (C) and Raji (D) cells. WB17/17.CD19.1_3S shows robust internalization in Ramos cells (C), but reduced uptake in Raji cells owing to CD21-mediated blocking. (E-F) illustrate internalization of bivalent CD19 aptamer WB15/17.CD19.1_3S in Ramos (E) and Raji (F) cells. The aptamer demonstrates high internalization efficiency in Ramos cells (E), but not CD21-positive Raji cells (F). Panels G and H: Internalization of bivalent CD19 aptamer WB15/15.CD19.1_3S in Ramos (G) and Raji (H) cells. Similar to other bivalent aptamers, WB15/15.CD19.1_3S internalizes efficiently in CD21-negative Ramos cells (G), but CD21 expression in Raji cells (H) significantly blocks its internalization. Data are expressed as the percentage of internalization calculated as . Each bar represents mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments.

Article Snippet: PE-conjugated CD19 anti-human monoclonal antibody (mouse, isotype IgG1, Clone 4G7, Catalog no. PE-65|97, Proteintech), PE-conjugated CD19 mouse anti-human (isotype IgG1, κ, Clone SJ25C1, Catalog no. 12-0198-42, Invitrogen), PE-conjugated CD20 anti-human (mouse, isotype IgG2b, κ, Clone 2H7, Catalog no. 302305, BioLegend), PE Mouse IgG1, κ, isotype control (CloneMOPC-21, Catalog no. 556650, BD Pharmingen), FITC-conjugated CD20 anti-human monoclonal antibody (mouse, isotype IgG2b, Clone 2H7, Catalog no. 35-0209-T100), FITC-conjugated CD19 mouse anti-human (isotype IgG1, κ, Clone SJ25C1, Catalog no. 363008, BioLegend), Monoclonal Rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (Clone 60024B; Catalog no. IC1051G, R&D Systems, MN), APC Mouse IgG1, κ, Isotype Ctrl (FC) (Clone MOPC-21; Catalog no. 400122), APC-conjugated CD19 anti-human (mouse, isotype IgG1, κ, Clone SJ25C1, Catalog no. 17-0198-42, Invitrogen), APC-conjugated mouse anti-human CD20 (isotype IgG2b, κ, Clone 2H7, Catalog no. 559776, BD Pharmingen), and APC-conjugated CD21 mouse anti-human (isotype IgG2a κ, Clone HB5, Catalog no. 17-0219-42, Invitrogen) were used for routine flow cytometry analysis.

Techniques: Expressing, Blocking Assay, Standard Deviation

Colocalization of CD19 and CD21 was confirmed by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy, whereas CD20 does not co-localize with CD21. (A) demonstrates flow cytometry histograms showing CD19 (A1: PE-CD19 mAb, Red) and CD21 (A2: APC-CD21 mAb, Light Blue) fluorescence intensity in Raji cells. (A3) Bi-parametric dot plot confirms colocalization of CD19 and CD21 on the same population of cells. (B) shows bar graph quantifying mean fluorescence intensity of CD19 and CD21, highlighting their robust expression on Raji cells. (C–E) Confocal microscopy images showing CD19 (C: PE-CD19, Red) colocalized with CD21 (D: APC-CD21, Light Blue) on the surface of Raji cells. Arrowheads indicate regions of colocalization (D). Panels F1–F3 illustrate flow cytometry analysis of bivalent CD19 aptamer WB17/17.CD19.1_3S (F1: Pink) binding to Raji cells and its colocalization with CD21 (F2: APC-CD21 mAb, Light Blue). (F3) Dot plot shows overlapping signals, confirming aptamer-CD21 interaction. (G) demonstrates the bar graph of mean fluorescence intensity of bivalent CD19 aptamer (WB17/17.CD19.1_3S) and CD21 antibody. (H–J) present confocal microscopy images showing WB17/17.CD19.1_3S (H: Red) colocalized with CD21 (I: Green) on Raji cells. Arrowheads highlight colocalized regions (J). (K1–K3) Flow cytometry analysis showing CD20 (K1: FITC-CD20 mAb, Green) and CD21 (K2: APC-CD21 mAb, Light Blue) fluorescence intensity in Raji cells. (K3) Dot plot shows no significant overlap between CD20 and CD21, indicating no colocalization. (L) Bar graph showing fluorescence intensity of CD20 and CD21. (M–O) Confocal microscopy images showing no colocalization between CD20 (M: Red) and CD21 (N: Green) on Raji cells (O). (P1–P3) Flow cytometry analysis of bivalent CD20 aptamer WB1/1.CD20.1_3S (P1: Blue) and CD21 (P2: APC-CD21 mAb, Light Blue). (P3) Dot plot confirms the absence of colocalization on the same population of cells. Panel Q: Bar graph of fluorescence intensity for CD20 aptamer and CD21. (R–T) Confocal microscopy images showing that WB1/1.CD20.1_3S (R: Red) and CD21 (S: Green) do not co-localize on Raji cells (T). Scale bars = 5 μm. Mean fluorescence intensity was calculated using the formula: Mean fluorescence intensity=Aptamer Mean Fluorescence − Random DNA Mean Fluorescence for aptamer. As for antibody it was calculated using the formula: Mean fluorescence intensity=Antibody Mean Fluorescence − Isotype Control Mean Fluorescence. The aptamer/random and antibody/isotype mean fluorescence values corresponds to the mean fluorescence observed in their respective histograms. Data represents mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. Each bar represents mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: The biochemical function of bivalent aptamer assemblies against B-cell markers CD19 and CD20

doi: 10.1101/2025.01.26.634939

Figure Lengend Snippet: Colocalization of CD19 and CD21 was confirmed by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy, whereas CD20 does not co-localize with CD21. (A) demonstrates flow cytometry histograms showing CD19 (A1: PE-CD19 mAb, Red) and CD21 (A2: APC-CD21 mAb, Light Blue) fluorescence intensity in Raji cells. (A3) Bi-parametric dot plot confirms colocalization of CD19 and CD21 on the same population of cells. (B) shows bar graph quantifying mean fluorescence intensity of CD19 and CD21, highlighting their robust expression on Raji cells. (C–E) Confocal microscopy images showing CD19 (C: PE-CD19, Red) colocalized with CD21 (D: APC-CD21, Light Blue) on the surface of Raji cells. Arrowheads indicate regions of colocalization (D). Panels F1–F3 illustrate flow cytometry analysis of bivalent CD19 aptamer WB17/17.CD19.1_3S (F1: Pink) binding to Raji cells and its colocalization with CD21 (F2: APC-CD21 mAb, Light Blue). (F3) Dot plot shows overlapping signals, confirming aptamer-CD21 interaction. (G) demonstrates the bar graph of mean fluorescence intensity of bivalent CD19 aptamer (WB17/17.CD19.1_3S) and CD21 antibody. (H–J) present confocal microscopy images showing WB17/17.CD19.1_3S (H: Red) colocalized with CD21 (I: Green) on Raji cells. Arrowheads highlight colocalized regions (J). (K1–K3) Flow cytometry analysis showing CD20 (K1: FITC-CD20 mAb, Green) and CD21 (K2: APC-CD21 mAb, Light Blue) fluorescence intensity in Raji cells. (K3) Dot plot shows no significant overlap between CD20 and CD21, indicating no colocalization. (L) Bar graph showing fluorescence intensity of CD20 and CD21. (M–O) Confocal microscopy images showing no colocalization between CD20 (M: Red) and CD21 (N: Green) on Raji cells (O). (P1–P3) Flow cytometry analysis of bivalent CD20 aptamer WB1/1.CD20.1_3S (P1: Blue) and CD21 (P2: APC-CD21 mAb, Light Blue). (P3) Dot plot confirms the absence of colocalization on the same population of cells. Panel Q: Bar graph of fluorescence intensity for CD20 aptamer and CD21. (R–T) Confocal microscopy images showing that WB1/1.CD20.1_3S (R: Red) and CD21 (S: Green) do not co-localize on Raji cells (T). Scale bars = 5 μm. Mean fluorescence intensity was calculated using the formula: Mean fluorescence intensity=Aptamer Mean Fluorescence − Random DNA Mean Fluorescence for aptamer. As for antibody it was calculated using the formula: Mean fluorescence intensity=Antibody Mean Fluorescence − Isotype Control Mean Fluorescence. The aptamer/random and antibody/isotype mean fluorescence values corresponds to the mean fluorescence observed in their respective histograms. Data represents mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. Each bar represents mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments.

Article Snippet: PE-conjugated CD19 anti-human monoclonal antibody (mouse, isotype IgG1, Clone 4G7, Catalog no. PE-65|97, Proteintech), PE-conjugated CD19 mouse anti-human (isotype IgG1, κ, Clone SJ25C1, Catalog no. 12-0198-42, Invitrogen), PE-conjugated CD20 anti-human (mouse, isotype IgG2b, κ, Clone 2H7, Catalog no. 302305, BioLegend), PE Mouse IgG1, κ, isotype control (CloneMOPC-21, Catalog no. 556650, BD Pharmingen), FITC-conjugated CD20 anti-human monoclonal antibody (mouse, isotype IgG2b, Clone 2H7, Catalog no. 35-0209-T100), FITC-conjugated CD19 mouse anti-human (isotype IgG1, κ, Clone SJ25C1, Catalog no. 363008, BioLegend), Monoclonal Rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (Clone 60024B; Catalog no. IC1051G, R&D Systems, MN), APC Mouse IgG1, κ, Isotype Ctrl (FC) (Clone MOPC-21; Catalog no. 400122), APC-conjugated CD19 anti-human (mouse, isotype IgG1, κ, Clone SJ25C1, Catalog no. 17-0198-42, Invitrogen), APC-conjugated mouse anti-human CD20 (isotype IgG2b, κ, Clone 2H7, Catalog no. 559776, BD Pharmingen), and APC-conjugated CD21 mouse anti-human (isotype IgG2a κ, Clone HB5, Catalog no. 17-0219-42, Invitrogen) were used for routine flow cytometry analysis.

Techniques: Flow Cytometry, Confocal Microscopy, Fluorescence, Expressing, Binding Assay, Control, Standard Deviation

The expression of CD19, CD20, and CD21, the binding activity of bivalent CD19 aptamers, and the internalization dynamics of CD19 antibody and bivalent aptamers in OCl-LY7 and HBL-1 (DLBCL) cells. Antibody staining for CD19, CD20, and CD21 expression. (C; G) demonstrate flow cytometry histograms showing the expression of CD19 (C2: Red), CD20 (C1: Green), and CD21 (C3: Light Blue) on OCI-Ly7 (C), whereas HBL-1 (G) cells express CD19 (G2: Red), CD20 (G1: Green), and CD21 (G3: Light Blue). Isotype controls (gray) confirm specific binding. (D; H) Bar graphs showing mean fluorescence intensities, confirming robust expression of CD19 and CD20, but the absence of CD21 expression in both cell lines. Binding assay with bivalent CD19 aptamers (A1–A4, E1–E4). Fluorescence intensity histograms of bivalent CD19 aptamers (WB17/17.CD19.1_3S, WB15/17.CD19.1_3S, and WB15/15.CD19.1_3S) compared to random DNA control in OCI-Ly7 (A1–A4) and HBL-1 (E1–E4) cells. (B; F) illustrate bar graphs of mean fluorescence intensities showing high binding specificity of bivalent aptamers compared to controls. Internalization of CD19 antibody with and without Proteinase K (I, K). Flow cytometry histograms (L1) and bar graphs (L2) showing internalization dynamics of CD19 antibody in OCI-Ly7 (I), whereas flow cytometry histograms (K1) and bar graphs (K2) show internalization dynamics of CD19 antibody in HBL-1 (K) cells. Internalization was analyzed at 0 hour and 24 hours in the presence and absence of Proteinase K. Data reveal a significant reduction in surface fluorescence intensity after Proteinase K treatment, confirming internalization. Internalization of bivalent CD19 aptamers under the same conditions (J, L). Fluorescence intensity histograms (J1-J3, L1-L3) and bar graphs (J4 and L4) show the internalization of bivalent CD19 aptamers (WB17/17.CD19.1_3S (J2, L2), WB15/17.CD19.1_3S (J1, L1), and WB15/15.CD19.1_3S (J3, L3)) in OCI-Ly7 (J) and HBL-1 (L) cells. Internalization is measured at 0 hour and 24 hours with and without Proteinase K, demonstrating the effective uptake of bivalent aptamers. Data are expressed as the percentage of internalization calculated as fluorescence intensity was calculated using the formula. Mean fluorescence intensity=Aptamer Mean Fluorescence − Random DNA Mean Fluorescence for aptamer. As for antibody it was calculated using the formula: Mean fluorescence intensity=Antibody Mean Fluorescence − Isotype Control Mean Fluorescence. The aptamer/random and antibody/isotype mean fluorescence values corresponds to the mean fluorescence observed in their respective histograms. Each bar represents mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: The biochemical function of bivalent aptamer assemblies against B-cell markers CD19 and CD20

doi: 10.1101/2025.01.26.634939

Figure Lengend Snippet: The expression of CD19, CD20, and CD21, the binding activity of bivalent CD19 aptamers, and the internalization dynamics of CD19 antibody and bivalent aptamers in OCl-LY7 and HBL-1 (DLBCL) cells. Antibody staining for CD19, CD20, and CD21 expression. (C; G) demonstrate flow cytometry histograms showing the expression of CD19 (C2: Red), CD20 (C1: Green), and CD21 (C3: Light Blue) on OCI-Ly7 (C), whereas HBL-1 (G) cells express CD19 (G2: Red), CD20 (G1: Green), and CD21 (G3: Light Blue). Isotype controls (gray) confirm specific binding. (D; H) Bar graphs showing mean fluorescence intensities, confirming robust expression of CD19 and CD20, but the absence of CD21 expression in both cell lines. Binding assay with bivalent CD19 aptamers (A1–A4, E1–E4). Fluorescence intensity histograms of bivalent CD19 aptamers (WB17/17.CD19.1_3S, WB15/17.CD19.1_3S, and WB15/15.CD19.1_3S) compared to random DNA control in OCI-Ly7 (A1–A4) and HBL-1 (E1–E4) cells. (B; F) illustrate bar graphs of mean fluorescence intensities showing high binding specificity of bivalent aptamers compared to controls. Internalization of CD19 antibody with and without Proteinase K (I, K). Flow cytometry histograms (L1) and bar graphs (L2) showing internalization dynamics of CD19 antibody in OCI-Ly7 (I), whereas flow cytometry histograms (K1) and bar graphs (K2) show internalization dynamics of CD19 antibody in HBL-1 (K) cells. Internalization was analyzed at 0 hour and 24 hours in the presence and absence of Proteinase K. Data reveal a significant reduction in surface fluorescence intensity after Proteinase K treatment, confirming internalization. Internalization of bivalent CD19 aptamers under the same conditions (J, L). Fluorescence intensity histograms (J1-J3, L1-L3) and bar graphs (J4 and L4) show the internalization of bivalent CD19 aptamers (WB17/17.CD19.1_3S (J2, L2), WB15/17.CD19.1_3S (J1, L1), and WB15/15.CD19.1_3S (J3, L3)) in OCI-Ly7 (J) and HBL-1 (L) cells. Internalization is measured at 0 hour and 24 hours with and without Proteinase K, demonstrating the effective uptake of bivalent aptamers. Data are expressed as the percentage of internalization calculated as fluorescence intensity was calculated using the formula. Mean fluorescence intensity=Aptamer Mean Fluorescence − Random DNA Mean Fluorescence for aptamer. As for antibody it was calculated using the formula: Mean fluorescence intensity=Antibody Mean Fluorescence − Isotype Control Mean Fluorescence. The aptamer/random and antibody/isotype mean fluorescence values corresponds to the mean fluorescence observed in their respective histograms. Each bar represents mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments.

Article Snippet: PE-conjugated CD19 anti-human monoclonal antibody (mouse, isotype IgG1, Clone 4G7, Catalog no. PE-65|97, Proteintech), PE-conjugated CD19 mouse anti-human (isotype IgG1, κ, Clone SJ25C1, Catalog no. 12-0198-42, Invitrogen), PE-conjugated CD20 anti-human (mouse, isotype IgG2b, κ, Clone 2H7, Catalog no. 302305, BioLegend), PE Mouse IgG1, κ, isotype control (CloneMOPC-21, Catalog no. 556650, BD Pharmingen), FITC-conjugated CD20 anti-human monoclonal antibody (mouse, isotype IgG2b, Clone 2H7, Catalog no. 35-0209-T100), FITC-conjugated CD19 mouse anti-human (isotype IgG1, κ, Clone SJ25C1, Catalog no. 363008, BioLegend), Monoclonal Rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (Clone 60024B; Catalog no. IC1051G, R&D Systems, MN), APC Mouse IgG1, κ, Isotype Ctrl (FC) (Clone MOPC-21; Catalog no. 400122), APC-conjugated CD19 anti-human (mouse, isotype IgG1, κ, Clone SJ25C1, Catalog no. 17-0198-42, Invitrogen), APC-conjugated mouse anti-human CD20 (isotype IgG2b, κ, Clone 2H7, Catalog no. 559776, BD Pharmingen), and APC-conjugated CD21 mouse anti-human (isotype IgG2a κ, Clone HB5, Catalog no. 17-0219-42, Invitrogen) were used for routine flow cytometry analysis.

Techniques: Expressing, Binding Assay, Activity Assay, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Fluorescence, Control, Standard Deviation

Internalization Assay of CD19 Antibody and Bivalent CD19 Aptamer in Ramos and OCI-Ly7 Cells Visualized by Confocal Microscopy. Internalization of CD19 Antibody in Ramos Cells (A-D). Confocal images showing surface-bound APC-CD19 antibody (A1-A2: Red) at 0 hour with and without Hoechst nuclear staining (A2: Blue). (B1–B2) demonstrate the isotype control at 0 hour. Panels C1-C2 show the internalization of APC-CD19 after 24 hours (C1-C2: Red) with and without Hoechst nuclear staining (C2: Blue). (E) Bar graph quantifying the mean fluorescence intensity of APC-CD19 antibody with and without Proteinase K treatment at 0 and 24 hours. Internalization of Bivalent CD19 Aptamer WB17/17.CD19.1_3S in Ramos Cells (F-I). Initial binding of WB17/17.CD19.1_3S (F1-F2: Green) at 0 hours, as shown with Hoechst-stained nuclei (F2: Blue). (H1–H2) demonstrate internalization of WB17/17.CD19.1_3S at 24 hours with and without Hoechst nuclear staining (H2: Blue). (J) shows the bar graph quantifying the mean fluorescence intensity of WB17/17.CD19.1_3S with and without Proteinase K treatment at 0 and 24 hours. Internalization of CD19 Antibody in OCI-Ly7 Cells (K-N) Surface-bound APC-CD19 antibody at 0 hours (K1-K2). (M1–M2) illustrate reduced surface-bound fluorescence at 24 hours, consistent with internalization. After 24 hours, CD19 antibody is completely uptaken on OCl-Ly7 cells. (O) Bar graph quantifying the mean fluorescence intensity of APC-CD19 antibody with and without Proteinase K treatment at 0 and 24 hours. Internalization of Bivalent CD19 Aptamer WB17/17.CD19.1_3S in OCI-Ly7 Cells (P-S). Confocal images showing WB17/17.CD19.1_3S (P1: Green) binding at 0 hours with and without Hoechst nuclear staining (P2: Blue). (R1–R2) highlight internalized WB17/17.CD19.1_3S at 24 hours with Hoechst nuclear staining (R2). Panel T shows the bar graph quantifying the mean fluorescence intensity of WB17/17.CD19.1_3S with and without Proteinase K treatment at 0 and 24 hours. Scale Bars: 5 μm. Data represent mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. Each bar represents mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: The biochemical function of bivalent aptamer assemblies against B-cell markers CD19 and CD20

doi: 10.1101/2025.01.26.634939

Figure Lengend Snippet: Internalization Assay of CD19 Antibody and Bivalent CD19 Aptamer in Ramos and OCI-Ly7 Cells Visualized by Confocal Microscopy. Internalization of CD19 Antibody in Ramos Cells (A-D). Confocal images showing surface-bound APC-CD19 antibody (A1-A2: Red) at 0 hour with and without Hoechst nuclear staining (A2: Blue). (B1–B2) demonstrate the isotype control at 0 hour. Panels C1-C2 show the internalization of APC-CD19 after 24 hours (C1-C2: Red) with and without Hoechst nuclear staining (C2: Blue). (E) Bar graph quantifying the mean fluorescence intensity of APC-CD19 antibody with and without Proteinase K treatment at 0 and 24 hours. Internalization of Bivalent CD19 Aptamer WB17/17.CD19.1_3S in Ramos Cells (F-I). Initial binding of WB17/17.CD19.1_3S (F1-F2: Green) at 0 hours, as shown with Hoechst-stained nuclei (F2: Blue). (H1–H2) demonstrate internalization of WB17/17.CD19.1_3S at 24 hours with and without Hoechst nuclear staining (H2: Blue). (J) shows the bar graph quantifying the mean fluorescence intensity of WB17/17.CD19.1_3S with and without Proteinase K treatment at 0 and 24 hours. Internalization of CD19 Antibody in OCI-Ly7 Cells (K-N) Surface-bound APC-CD19 antibody at 0 hours (K1-K2). (M1–M2) illustrate reduced surface-bound fluorescence at 24 hours, consistent with internalization. After 24 hours, CD19 antibody is completely uptaken on OCl-Ly7 cells. (O) Bar graph quantifying the mean fluorescence intensity of APC-CD19 antibody with and without Proteinase K treatment at 0 and 24 hours. Internalization of Bivalent CD19 Aptamer WB17/17.CD19.1_3S in OCI-Ly7 Cells (P-S). Confocal images showing WB17/17.CD19.1_3S (P1: Green) binding at 0 hours with and without Hoechst nuclear staining (P2: Blue). (R1–R2) highlight internalized WB17/17.CD19.1_3S at 24 hours with Hoechst nuclear staining (R2). Panel T shows the bar graph quantifying the mean fluorescence intensity of WB17/17.CD19.1_3S with and without Proteinase K treatment at 0 and 24 hours. Scale Bars: 5 μm. Data represent mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments. Each bar represents mean ± standard deviation from three independent experiments.

Article Snippet: PE-conjugated CD19 anti-human monoclonal antibody (mouse, isotype IgG1, Clone 4G7, Catalog no. PE-65|97, Proteintech), PE-conjugated CD19 mouse anti-human (isotype IgG1, κ, Clone SJ25C1, Catalog no. 12-0198-42, Invitrogen), PE-conjugated CD20 anti-human (mouse, isotype IgG2b, κ, Clone 2H7, Catalog no. 302305, BioLegend), PE Mouse IgG1, κ, isotype control (CloneMOPC-21, Catalog no. 556650, BD Pharmingen), FITC-conjugated CD20 anti-human monoclonal antibody (mouse, isotype IgG2b, Clone 2H7, Catalog no. 35-0209-T100), FITC-conjugated CD19 mouse anti-human (isotype IgG1, κ, Clone SJ25C1, Catalog no. 363008, BioLegend), Monoclonal Rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 488 (Clone 60024B; Catalog no. IC1051G, R&D Systems, MN), APC Mouse IgG1, κ, Isotype Ctrl (FC) (Clone MOPC-21; Catalog no. 400122), APC-conjugated CD19 anti-human (mouse, isotype IgG1, κ, Clone SJ25C1, Catalog no. 17-0198-42, Invitrogen), APC-conjugated mouse anti-human CD20 (isotype IgG2b, κ, Clone 2H7, Catalog no. 559776, BD Pharmingen), and APC-conjugated CD21 mouse anti-human (isotype IgG2a κ, Clone HB5, Catalog no. 17-0219-42, Invitrogen) were used for routine flow cytometry analysis.

Techniques: Confocal Microscopy, Staining, Control, Fluorescence, Binding Assay, Standard Deviation

Antibodies used.

Journal: Neurobiology of Pain

Article Title: B-cell and plasma cell activation in a mouse model of chronic muscle pain

doi: 10.1016/j.ynpai.2024.100169

Figure Lengend Snippet: Antibodies used.

Article Snippet: Anti-CD19 APC conjugate , Tonbo , 20–0193 , 1:200 , AB_2621562.

Techniques: Purification

Comparative analysis of NK cell profile in CMV-infected vs. uninfected pregnant women. Representative gating strategy for CMV-induced memory-like NK cell subsets is shown in panel ( A ). Scatter plots with bar (mean ± SD) depict frequency distribution with respect to ( B ) live lymphocytes of NK (CD56+CD16+/−), CD56bright (CD56brightCD16−), CD56dim (CD56dimCD16+), and CD56low (CD56lowCD16+) cells gated on CD3-CD19-CD14− cells. ( C ) CD56dim cells of subpopulations distinguished on the basis of surface expression levels of CD57, DNAM-1, KIR, NKG2A, NKG2C, NKG2D, and PD-1 markers, either alone or in combination. Mann–Whitney test was used to assess differences in cell frequencies between CMV-infected (orange dots, n = 17) and uninfected (green dots, n = 5) pregnant women. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

Journal: Viruses

Article Title: Characterization of Natural Killer Cell Profile in a Cohort of Infected Pregnant Women and Their Babies and Its Relation to CMV Transmission

doi: 10.3390/v16050780

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparative analysis of NK cell profile in CMV-infected vs. uninfected pregnant women. Representative gating strategy for CMV-induced memory-like NK cell subsets is shown in panel ( A ). Scatter plots with bar (mean ± SD) depict frequency distribution with respect to ( B ) live lymphocytes of NK (CD56+CD16+/−), CD56bright (CD56brightCD16−), CD56dim (CD56dimCD16+), and CD56low (CD56lowCD16+) cells gated on CD3-CD19-CD14− cells. ( C ) CD56dim cells of subpopulations distinguished on the basis of surface expression levels of CD57, DNAM-1, KIR, NKG2A, NKG2C, NKG2D, and PD-1 markers, either alone or in combination. Mann–Whitney test was used to assess differences in cell frequencies between CMV-infected (orange dots, n = 17) and uninfected (green dots, n = 5) pregnant women. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

Article Snippet: Before fixing for 20 min at RT with 1% PFA, cells were stained for 20 min at 4 °C with BV510-conjugated anti-CD16, PE-CF594-conjugated anti-CD3, BV605-conjugated anti-CD14, APC-conjugated anti-CD57, BV786-conjugated anti-DNAM-1, BV421-conjugated anti-PD-1 (all from BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), PerCP-conjugated anti-CD56 (from Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), APC Alexa Fluor 750-conjugated anti-CD19 (from Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), PE-conjugated anti-NKG2C (from Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, DE, USA), and PE-Cy7-conjugated anti-NKp46 (from BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) mAbs.

Techniques: Infection, Expressing, MANN-WHITNEY

Comparative analysis of NK cell profile in CMV-transmitting vs. non-transmitting mothers. ( A,B ) Scatter plots with bar (mean ± SD) depict frequency distribution, as in B,C. Unpaired t test and Mann–Whitney test were used to assess differences in cell frequencies between transmitting (red dots, n = 8) and non-transmitting (blue dots, n = 9) mothers. Significance was set at p < 0.05. ( C ) tSNE algorithm was configured to distribute data combined from transmitting and non-transmitting mothers’ samples according to the expression of NK cell markers CD56, CD16, NKG2C, NKG2A, CD57, NKG2D, DNAM-1, KIRs, and PD-1. Multigraph histogram overlays with geomean values were generated in a combined FCS file obtained by concatenating 2000 events in NK cell down-sample (identified as CD3-CD19-CD14- live lymphocytes) of transmitting (red, n = 7) and non-transmitting (blue, n = 8) mothers. ( D ) By using the same combined FCS file, single parameter heatmaps were obtained for transmitting (upper panels) and non-transmitting (lower panels) groups. Outline population (black circle) is specific to non-transmitting mothers and only the expressed markers are reported. TD NK: terminally differentiated NK; ML NK: memory-like NK.

Journal: Viruses

Article Title: Characterization of Natural Killer Cell Profile in a Cohort of Infected Pregnant Women and Their Babies and Its Relation to CMV Transmission

doi: 10.3390/v16050780

Figure Lengend Snippet: Comparative analysis of NK cell profile in CMV-transmitting vs. non-transmitting mothers. ( A,B ) Scatter plots with bar (mean ± SD) depict frequency distribution, as in B,C. Unpaired t test and Mann–Whitney test were used to assess differences in cell frequencies between transmitting (red dots, n = 8) and non-transmitting (blue dots, n = 9) mothers. Significance was set at p < 0.05. ( C ) tSNE algorithm was configured to distribute data combined from transmitting and non-transmitting mothers’ samples according to the expression of NK cell markers CD56, CD16, NKG2C, NKG2A, CD57, NKG2D, DNAM-1, KIRs, and PD-1. Multigraph histogram overlays with geomean values were generated in a combined FCS file obtained by concatenating 2000 events in NK cell down-sample (identified as CD3-CD19-CD14- live lymphocytes) of transmitting (red, n = 7) and non-transmitting (blue, n = 8) mothers. ( D ) By using the same combined FCS file, single parameter heatmaps were obtained for transmitting (upper panels) and non-transmitting (lower panels) groups. Outline population (black circle) is specific to non-transmitting mothers and only the expressed markers are reported. TD NK: terminally differentiated NK; ML NK: memory-like NK.

Article Snippet: Before fixing for 20 min at RT with 1% PFA, cells were stained for 20 min at 4 °C with BV510-conjugated anti-CD16, PE-CF594-conjugated anti-CD3, BV605-conjugated anti-CD14, APC-conjugated anti-CD57, BV786-conjugated anti-DNAM-1, BV421-conjugated anti-PD-1 (all from BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), PerCP-conjugated anti-CD56 (from Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), APC Alexa Fluor 750-conjugated anti-CD19 (from Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), PE-conjugated anti-NKG2C (from Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, DE, USA), and PE-Cy7-conjugated anti-NKp46 (from BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) mAbs.

Techniques: MANN-WHITNEY, Expressing, Generated